Publications
Rethinking Adaptation Interventions in Agricultural Systems for Sustainability
Vallury, S., Nelson, D. R., & Cook, N. J. 2025. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 77: 101571.
Abstract: Global policy frameworks have accelerated investments in agricultural adaptation interventions. However, prevailing approaches often conflate adoption intensity with success, overlooking the complex behavioral, structural, and temporal dynamics that shape who can sustain adoptions over time. We synthesize empirical evidence to argue that a narrow focus on adoption in adaptation intervention programs risks exacerbating inequalities in agricultural systems. Many such programs view adoption as a one-time decision, disproportionately target resource-rich farmers, and overlook the dynamic, long-term conditions essential for sustained adoption. Sustained use of adaptation strategies, however, requires distinct capacities, and when farmers discontinue these strategies, they can become entrenched in poverty traps, leading to widening wealth inequalities between sustained adopters and dropouts. Marginalized farmers are particularly vulnerable to these outcomes, which contradict the equity goals of policy frameworks. This review emphasizes the need to re-evaluate adaptation intervention programs in agricultural systems to better address the long-term needs of marginalized communities.
Social Inequalities Shape Climate Change Adaptation Among Indian Farmers
Vallury, S., N. J. Cook, & Nelson, D. R. 2024. Environmental Research Letters 19(11): 114035.
Abstract: Agricultural technologies are vital for farmers adapting to climate change. However, while efforts have focused on improving access and initial adoption, little attention has been given to social disparities in rates of adoption and the benefits derived from these technologies. Our study investigates the adoption of groundwater irrigation technology in India, a transformative innovation that has historically enhanced productivity and food security, and helped agricultural households adapt to a changing climate. We use a nationwide household survey sample that spans nearly a decade, capturing a key period of groundwater expansion in India. Our analysis reveals that members of highly marginalized social groups are less likely to adopt groundwater irrigation technologies, and less likely to sustain their use of the technologies for long periods of time. Furthermore, the household-level benefits of the technologies–operationalized through the relationship between technology adoption and income–appear lower for households belonging to historically marginalized groups compared to the historically advantaged. Our study underscores the importance of addressing social inequalities in both adoption as well as the sustained utilization of agricultural technologies and other climate adaptation tools. Disparities in the utilization of these technologies can hinder farmers’ ability to access new innovations and adapt to increasing threats from climate change. Targeted policies and interventions are essential to not only provide historically marginalized groups access to technological innovations, but also facilitate their effective utilization.
Selected working papers
Multi-Level Governance and Justice Integration Across State and Local Adaptation Plans
Zhang, F., Vallury, S., & N. J. Cook. Currently under review.
Abstract: Studies examining social justice integration in climate adaptation plans usually concentrate on large cities, rely on stand-alone plans, and analyze small samples. This study advances the literature by examining justice integration across U.S. state and local adaptation plans and by exploring cross-scale governance dynamics. Applying a four-dimensional justice framework (distributional, procedural, recognitional, restorative), we analyze 171 state adaptation plans (SAPs) and 226 local resilience plans (LRPs). Using structural topic modeling and sentence-level embeddings, we identify and compare justice-related content across plans, scales, and policy domains. Findings reveal that justice is unevenly incorporated across plans, governance scales, and domains. Domain analysis shows SAPs prioritize biodiversity and habitat conservation, public health, and climate impact mitigation, while LRPs concentrate on urban infrastructure, land-use planning, multi-hazard risks, and coastal protection. At the justice-dimension level, SAPs emphasize distributional, recognitional, and restorative justice—often invoking equity symbolically or for legitimation—whereas LRPs foreground procedural justice, linking equity to participation, affordability, and implementation. Cross-scale analysis reveals limited evidence of state-to-local justice diffusion: state-level justice commitments do not systematically predict justice language in local plans. These results challenge assumptions that high-level justice commitments automatically cascade to local action. Advancing equitable climate resilience requires deliberate vertical coordination that translates symbolic state-level equity framings into grounded, participatory local practices.
Nathan J Cook 